<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Optimal Screen Resolution for Web Design (2010 Update)</title> <atom:link href="http://www.stayonsearch.com/optimal-screen-resolution-for-web-design-2010-update/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.stayonsearch.com/optimal-screen-resolution-for-web-design-2010-update</link> <description>Search &#38; Social Media Marketing Tips, Resources, and Discussions</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 15:09:41 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator> <item><title>By: J. Hogue</title><link>http://www.stayonsearch.com/optimal-screen-resolution-for-web-design-2010-update/comment-page-1#comment-2780</link> <dc:creator>J. Hogue</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 19:59:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.stayonsearch.com/?p=1458#comment-2780</guid> <description>I&#039;m a designer and so I think about these numbers all the time. The question about what amount of screen is left over once one accounts for the browsers tool bars is a good one, and frustratingly, is different depending on the browser.All results are for a 1280 x 800 screen. Mac users do not have a bottom bar, so subtract 22 px for the OS top bar. Windows has a 22px top bar and a variable bottom bar, but XP users can expect at least another 30px for the bottom taskbar. Vista users need to account for a 40px taskbar (subtract another 10px from the numbers below):IE8: About 1000 x 630 (topbar with tabs is 120px tall)
IE7: About 1000 x 630 (topbar with tabs is 118px tall)
IE6: About 1000 x 700 (top bar is 80px tall - no tabs allowed)
FF4: About 1000 x 670 (topbar with tabs and bookmarks is 110 px tall)
Safari: About 1000 x 680 (topbar with tabs is 94 px tall)
Chrome: About 1000 x 700 (topbar with tabs is 72 px tall)So, with sites that you do not want to scroll, a safe size is 620 tall... 600 tall is probably safest.In order to get it to fit nicely on the iPhone, consider fitting the dimensions into the 320 x 240 (or 3:4) aspect ratio.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a designer and so I think about these numbers all the time. The question about what amount of screen is left over once one accounts for the browsers tool bars is a good one, and frustratingly, is different depending on the browser.</p><p>All results are for a 1280 x 800 screen. Mac users do not have a bottom bar, so subtract 22 px for the OS top bar. Windows has a 22px top bar and a variable bottom bar, but XP users can expect at least another 30px for the bottom taskbar. Vista users need to account for a 40px taskbar (subtract another 10px from the numbers below):</p><p>IE8: About 1000 x 630 (topbar with tabs is 120px tall)<br
/> IE7: About 1000 x 630 (topbar with tabs is 118px tall)<br
/> IE6: About 1000 x 700 (top bar is 80px tall &#8211; no tabs allowed)<br
/> FF4: About 1000 x 670 (topbar with tabs and bookmarks is 110 px tall)<br
/> Safari: About 1000 x 680 (topbar with tabs is 94 px tall)<br
/> Chrome: About 1000 x 700 (topbar with tabs is 72 px tall)</p><p>So, with sites that you do not want to scroll, a safe size is 620 tall&#8230; 600 tall is probably safest.</p><p>In order to get it to fit nicely on the iPhone, consider fitting the dimensions into the 320 x 240 (or 3:4) aspect ratio.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Keith</title><link>http://www.stayonsearch.com/optimal-screen-resolution-for-web-design-2010-update/comment-page-1#comment-2590</link> <dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 16:14:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.stayonsearch.com/?p=1458#comment-2590</guid> <description>My programmers designed for 1024x768 - my site is simple and my rule is &quot;no scrolls&quot; -
even with that - I now have scrolls :)
They did not anticipate a tool bar or a start bar across the bottom.
How stupid is that?  Any advice or data on how many pixels of a typ screen are lost top and bottom for this &quot;normal&quot; stuff?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My programmers designed for 1024&#215;768 &#8211; my site is simple and my rule is &#8220;no scrolls&#8221; -<br
/> even with that &#8211; I now have scrolls <img
src='http://www.stayonsearch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br
/> They did not anticipate a tool bar or a start bar across the bottom.<br
/> How stupid is that?  Any advice or data on how many pixels of a typ screen are lost top and bottom for this &#8220;normal&#8221; stuff?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mark Thompson</title><link>http://www.stayonsearch.com/optimal-screen-resolution-for-web-design-2010-update/comment-page-1#comment-1705</link> <dc:creator>Mark Thompson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 07:17:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.stayonsearch.com/?p=1458#comment-1705</guid> <description>That is actually a great question.  I am not 100% sure, since I really am not a web designer.  I know when I was working with the web designer who did my Twitter background, we had to upload the image then set the background color to match the image color.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I would probably just do a Google search for &quot;Screen Resolution for Twitter Backgrounds&quot; or something similar to that.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I would love to hear what you find out :-)  Sorry I couldn&#039;t be of more help.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is actually a great question.  I am not 100% sure, since I really am not a web designer.  I know when I was working with the web designer who did my Twitter background, we had to upload the image then set the background color to match the image color.</p><p>I would probably just do a Google search for &#8220;Screen Resolution for Twitter Backgrounds&#8221; or something similar to that.</p><p>I would love to hear what you find out <img
src='http://www.stayonsearch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> Sorry I couldn&#39;t be of more help.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ahintoffig</title><link>http://www.stayonsearch.com/optimal-screen-resolution-for-web-design-2010-update/comment-page-1#comment-1692</link> <dc:creator>Ahintoffig</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 06:57:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.stayonsearch.com/?p=1458#comment-1692</guid> <description>Hi Mark! I&#039;m curious as to your thoughts on designing twitter backgrounds...looks like your twitter acct is designed for a 1280 x 800, but I&#039;m reading that custom backgrounds should still be done at 1024 x 768.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mark! I&#39;m curious as to your thoughts on designing twitter backgrounds&#8230;looks like your twitter acct is designed for a 1280 x 800, but I&#39;m reading that custom backgrounds should still be done at 1024 x 768.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: katinka</title><link>http://www.stayonsearch.com/optimal-screen-resolution-for-web-design-2010-update/comment-page-1#comment-547</link> <dc:creator>katinka</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 17:05:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.stayonsearch.com/?p=1458#comment-547</guid> <description>Since browsing with mobile devices seems to be upcoming, I would expect that their smaller screen sizes will soon start showing up in statistics as well.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since browsing with mobile devices seems to be upcoming, I would expect that their smaller screen sizes will soon start showing up in statistics as well.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: rapo007</title><link>http://www.stayonsearch.com/optimal-screen-resolution-for-web-design-2010-update/comment-page-1#comment-537</link> <dc:creator>rapo007</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 12:05:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.stayonsearch.com/?p=1458#comment-537</guid> <description>Thanks for your updation</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your updation</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tips for Web Designers From an Internet Marketer’s Perspective &#124; lead5.com</title><link>http://www.stayonsearch.com/optimal-screen-resolution-for-web-design-2010-update/comment-page-1#comment-385</link> <dc:creator>Tips for Web Designers From an Internet Marketer’s Perspective &#124; lead5.com</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 05:44:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.stayonsearch.com/?p=1458#comment-385</guid> <description>[...] Design a Site for Optimal Screen Resolution [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Design a Site for Optimal Screen Resolution [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David hehehe is me</title><link>http://www.stayonsearch.com/optimal-screen-resolution-for-web-design-2010-update/comment-page-1#comment-384</link> <dc:creator>David hehehe is me</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 02:13:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.stayonsearch.com/?p=1458#comment-384</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;Optimal Screen Resolution for Web Design (2010&#160;Update)...&lt;/strong&gt;......</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Optimal Screen Resolution for Web Design (2010&nbsp;Update)&#8230;</strong></p><p>&#8230;&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Optimal screen resolution for web design &#124; StayOnSearch</title><link>http://www.stayonsearch.com/optimal-screen-resolution-for-web-design-2010-update/comment-page-1#comment-360</link> <dc:creator>Optimal screen resolution for web design &#124; StayOnSearch</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 00:22:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.stayonsearch.com/?p=1458#comment-360</guid> <description>[...] for Web Design Posted by Mark Thompson in Design/DevelopmentMay 30th, 2008 &#124; View commentsCommentsUPDATE:  2010 Screen Resolution StatisticsScreen resolutions have changed a lot over the past 8 years. Computer monitors have migrated to [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for Web Design Posted by Mark Thompson in Design/DevelopmentMay 30th, 2008 | View commentsCommentsUPDATE:  2010 Screen Resolution StatisticsScreen resolutions have changed a lot over the past 8 years. Computer monitors have migrated to [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 23/38 queries in 0.076 seconds using disk

Served from: www.stayonsearch.com @ 2010-09-09 16:56:02 -->